Our workplaces continue to evolve, bringing new challenges that extend beyond traditional measures of performance and productivity. Among the most concerning of these is a new phenomenon known as quiet cracking. Unlike quiet quitting, which is an intentional reduction of effort, quiet cracking represents a silent, internal breakdown resulting from things like sustained stress, unclear expectations, or inadequate organizational support. Early signs are subtle, making it more difficult for employers to identify and address.
Employees experiencing quiet cracking may outwardly appear to perform at expected levels—meeting deadlines, attending meetings, and maintaining professional responsibilities. However, internally, they are struggling with disengagement, anxiety, or a diminished sense of purpose. Over time, this silent erosion can have significant consequences for both individuals and organizations, including decreased productivity, declining morale, and increased turnover. Gallup estimates employee disengagement is costing the global economy $8.8 trillion annually.
There are several contributing factors:
- Economic uncertainty and job insecurity.
- High workloads combined with unclear expectations.
- Poor leadership and insufficient recognition.
- Lack of access to training and career development opportunities.
The impact of quiet cracking reaches far beyond the individual employee, posing significant risks to organizations. Left unaddressed, toxic workplace conditions or neglected mental health concerns can expose employers to liability. Disengaged employees often share their experiences publicly, damaging the company’s reputation and undermining recruitment and retention efforts. At the same time, disengagement erodes productivity, weakens collaboration, and stifles innovation—factors that ultimately drive higher turnover.
Leaders and managers must be able to recognize declining performance, noticeable withdrawal from team discussions or social interactions, increased absenteeism, and a reluctance to take on additional responsibilities.
These behaviors should not be interpreted solely as performance issues but as opportunities to support the employee’s well-being. Organizations can mitigate the impact of quiet cracking through proactive engagement strategies:
- Clarify roles and expectations to reduce ambiguity and build confidence.
- Invest in learning and development to foster growth and strengthen retention.
- Create psychological safety by encouraging open dialogue and employee feedback.
- Encouraging individuals to seek support, communicate needs, and engage proactively to create a balanced approach where accountability is shared across all levels of the organization.
- Recognize and reward contributions to reinforce value and purpose.
- Support managers with training in empathy and listening skills, as their leadership often determines whether employees remain engaged.
By recognizing the signs early and investing in communication, recognition, and career development, employers can protect their workforce and safeguard long-term organizational health.
References:
- Wright, N. E. (2025, August 14). The silent shatter: What quiet cracking means for your workplace. Legal News & Business Law News. https://natlawreview.com/article/silent-shatter-what-quiet-cracking-means-your-workplace?utm_source=Robly.com&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2025-8-28%2BNLRLabor%2Band%2BEmployment%2BLegal%2BNews&utm_content=b1c9ce85b71a8397f1166a86d15d9be0
- Colvin, C. (2025, April 16). What is ‘quiet cracking’? Worker disengagement has a new name. HR Dive. https://www.hrdive.com/news/what-is-quiet-cracking-worker-trend/745384/
- Jackson, S. (2025, August 13). Step aside, quiet quitting. Now, employers have to worry about “quiet cracking.” Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/quiet-cracking-warning-signs-work-employees-for-2025-8